Last night I made a tremendous Pan Bagnet sandwich, with tuna, hard-boiled eggs, kalamata olives, green pepper, red onion, dijon vinagrette and tomatoes. It was fantastic, but it almost made John puke because he doesn’t like olives, vinegar or hard-boiled eggs. I convinced him to try it and he said later that he couldn’t get the taste out of his mouth. Ha ha.
Right now on NPR there’s a seriously conservative jackass who’s extremely full of himself, and people are calling in and just slamming him left and right. Now he’s talking about how he was called a “pro-Israel wacko” and how the people calling him that are obviously anti-semetic. That made me wonder, why is it that you can be pro-Israel, but if you’re pro-Muslim, you’re siding with terrorists?
The leading article on CounterPunch.org is all about the way Bush and Kerry are both wrong on the Iraq situation. I’d quote some statements from it, but you’d better just read it.
Michael Badnarik and the Libertarian Party are trying their best to get on the 3rd Presidential Debate. As fantastic as it would be to have a third party candidate stumping the big guys, I know damn well that Bush couldn’t handle it. And, because he couldn’t handle it, there’s no way he’ll even participate if Badnarik is added. Given the fact that Bush already breached the rules in debate #2, nothing would stop him from moving it to another city, or somehow ensuring Badnarik is not on the debate. This is another story where I hope I’m forced to eat my words. I would love to watch Bush be humiliated by an individual who’s not bound to a grocery list of bullshit.
Having been witness to GW’s bullshit for almost 4 full years now, I must admit there were moments in the last debate where I was stunned with Bush’s well-articulated responses. Stunned not because they were intelligent stances or legitimate ideas, but because he is simply not capable of assembling sentences on that level. Not long after the debate, rumors were circulating that he was wearing a wire. I held off posting anything on here because I couldn’t find a single picture, despite having seen the story multiple times. Well, today I found a wealth of information over at IsBushWired.com, a site devoted strictly to that topic. Not only that, but this BBC article features a highly-compressed, tiny JPG that still appears to clearly show the receiver AND the wire running up his right shoulder. IsBushWired.com also contains accounts from Bush/Cheney campaigners regarding the wire. One thing’s for sure, next time they’ll make sure you can’t see it.
Have you ever read a science article and thought to yourself: “I could have saved all those folks years of pointless research if they had just asked me that question”? Well, if not, here’s your very first chance. Research shows correlation between values and salary preferences of business executives. Yes, what they “discovered” is that executives concerned with ethics and values are more likely to have lower salaries than those executives who downplay values in their decisions. Shocking. Not only did I already assume that, but a lot of my discontent with the absurdly wealthy is based solely on this topic. Hording money while billions of people suffer is evil. Go ahead, call me a socialist.
Researches are finding that there is a good deal of brain activity that we just plain never noticed before, which somewhat debunks the old theory that we only use 10% of our brains. However, they seem mesmerized by the finding that younger brains do not exhibit the same amount of subconcious activity. I can offer a theory to explain that element, but it requires that you temporarily subscribe to the concept of Zen. In many publications on the topic of Zen, it is widely explained that children are born in a state of perpetual Zen. When you’re young, you haven’t “made up your mind” about a lot of things. Your list of preconceived notions is minimal to say the least. I believe that the subconcious activity they’re recognizing is the constant analysis of new information and how it relates to information already gathered. Because I doubt you know any Buddhist monks, probably everyone you know is guilty of this kind of processing. When you lay down to sleep, you’re often mulling over things that happened recently, or in some cases, a long time ago. When you’re a kid, so many things are fresh and new to you that you haven’t come to many conclusions about things. You don’t have all your memories to cross-reference new data with. I see this as an advantage for the Zen mind, or child’s mind, because it allows you to analyze information without bias. In my life, I try to never take a dogmatic stance on something I don’t already completely understand. Complete understanding is also a relative term, but without having a big ego, honest assessment of one’s knowledge on a topic is possible. So if you ever encounter me going off about someone’s inability to accept factual information stricly because of their set of preconceived notions, it’s because I am generally disgusted by that kind of behavior. (A great example of someone whose mind is completely closed for business is George W. Bush.)
Cleveland’s going to crack down on downtown panhandling. Hey, when you’re done with downtown, how about making your way over to the West Blvd. BP station? Either that is the world’s epicenter of vehicular breakdowns, or there’s a lot of panhandlers with the same damned spiel.